It amazes me how all these high end watch brands spend gagillions of dollars on R&D and marketing to convince the world how special, exclusive and well finished their watches are. They use this rational to justify the value of their high ticketed timepieces that they manufacture, yet they are the most grey marketed and their production numbers are not even one tenth that of Rolex.
If you think about it, Rolex is the mighty King in the watch industry for a reason, despite the fact that they make over 600,000 watches a year for the world. This brand is a commodity, holding its value and setting the example for the rest of the watch making world to follow.
Rolex wont stop at any limit to protect the sanctity of their trademark to honor their integrity. A recent example of this is when Rolex brought up a lawsuit against online after market dealer Melrose Jewelers. It’s been reported by many websites but in particular diamonds.net reported “Rolex sued Melrose Jewelers (melrose.com) on a number of actions related to counterfeiting and trademark infringement. According to Rolex, which secured three watches from the retailer for its case between February and June, the defendant uses ”spurious designations that are identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, the Rolex, Crown Device, DateJust and Oyster Perpetual trademarks, and possibly other Rolex registered trademarks, on the counterfeit watches and/or watch parts they sell.”
Rolex also alleged that Melrose intentionally used websites to promote sales, ”knowing they are counterfeit, in connection with the advertisement, promotion, offering for sale and sale of counterfeit watches and watch parts.”
Melrose.com claims that it acquires authentic luxury timepieces to sell online. Besides offering the Rolex brand, the company also sells Breitling, Cartier, Tag Heuer and Omega along with custom diamond jewelry. It claims that revenue in 2011 was more than $10 million. The company’s president, Krishan Agarwal, told the Los Angeles Times this morning that Melrose.com sells “preowned” watches and restores Rolex watches among others but it does not include counterfeit parts with those repairs. He said the company “will be vehemently defending the lawsuit and our right to resell used authentic goods.”
In court papers filed July 25, Rolex charged that Melrose.com used the Rolex registered trademarks to advertise and promote ”counterfeit watches” in a manner which was likely to cause consumer confusion and deception since Rolex’s products were not authorized, sanctioned, or affiliated with the retailer. Rolex concluded that the defendant’s actions constituted false designations of origin for commerce, false descriptions and unfair competition because such designations and representations tend to falsely describe and/or represent the defendant’s counterfeit watches and watch parts as those of Rolex in violation of the Lanham Act, according to the suit.
Additionally, Rolex alleged that Melrose.com owns and operates six parking sites (websites) rolexgiveaway.ca, rolexblogsite.com, rolexblogsite.net, rolexwatchforum.com, rolexwatchforum.net, rolexwatchforums.com and rolexwatchforums, that incorporate the Rolex trademark to specifically provide links and drive traffic to Melrose.com, none of which are authorized by Rolex.
Rolex is seeking an injunction, ordering Melrose.com to refrain from using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of the Rolex trademarks to identify any goods or the rendering of any services not authorized by Rolex. Furthermore, Rolex seeks to prevent action that would likely to cause consumer confusion, deception or mistake, or injury to its business reputation or dilute its trademarks; prevent false description or representation including words or other symbols tending to falsely describe or represent unauthorized goods as being those of Rolex; any end the use of the Rolex trademarks online in any form, from meta tags and keyword buys to images and domains.
The watch brand seeks statutory damages of up to $2 million for each trademark that the defendants have counterfeited, damages due to ”cybersquatting of the Rolex trademark and to account for all gains, profits and advantages therefrom derived.” Alternatively, Rolex seeks damages for of up to $100,000 per domain name, the costs and disbursements of the legal action, attorney and investigator fees and prejudgment interest along with punitive damages.”
Regardless of the outcome, this just shows us that Rolex is a brand you just don’t mess with. They are tightly controlled, reliable, and make the world more competent everyday with their timepieces. Rolex is a symbol of value, class, distinction and reliability because they stand alone from the rest, by their timeless philosophy that has lived on for over a century!